UK Pushes Apple to Loosen App Store Payment and NFC Rules - MacRumors
Skip to Content

UK Pushes Apple to Loosen App Store Payment and NFC Rules

The U.K.'s competition regulator has proposed letting app developers direct users to payment options outside Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store, in a move aimed at increasing competition and reducing the fees charged by the two companies.

app store blue banner uk fixed
As reported by Reuters, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said the proposals would remove restrictions that currently prevent U.K. developers from directing users to off-platform payment options.

The regulator said any fees Apple and Google charge developers for enabling such "steering" must be fair and reasonable, remain below existing App Store and Play Store commissions, and allow developers to either pass savings on to consumers or reinvest them in innovation.

The CMA said it was also considering making Apple open up access to its near-field communication (NFC) technology, which is used for Apple Pay contactless payments. This would allow developers to potentially offer alternative payment options within their own apps.

Last year, Apple was designated with strategic market status (SMS) in the U.K. for iOS and iPadOS, which enables the CMA to initiate targeted interventions designed to open the platforms to greater competition.

Apple has previously said it does not support allowing developers to direct users to off-platform payments. The company argues this ​could undermine user security and fraud ​protections, and limit its ability ⁠to verify transactions.

An Apple spokesperson told Reuters it could open the door to "scams, bait-and-switch tactics, and the circumvention of parental controls."

"When users are directed away from Apple's trusted payment infrastructure, they lose the protections ​they rely on Apple to provide," the spokesperson said, adding the U.S. tech giant would continue to "make ​our concerns clear" ⁠to the CMA.

In February, Apple and Google agreed to a series of changes aimed at making their app stores fairer for developers. Under terms published by the CMA, both companies said they will ensure apps are reviewed and ranked on their app stores in a "fair, objective and transparent way," without discrimination against apps that compete with their own services.

Apple must allow developers to more easily request access to iOS features and functionality, which could clear the way for third-party apps to better compete with Apple's own services.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

iOS App Store General Feature JoeBlue

Apple Adds Personalized Recommendations and New Marketing Tools to the App Store

Monday June 15, 2026 5:18 am PDT by
Apple last week announced a series of new App Store features, including personalized app recommendations and expanded tools for developers to market their apps. The most visible change for users is Personalized Collections, a new discovery feature that surfaces app and game recommendations tailored to individual interests and behavior. Alongside each recommendation, new "App Notes" explain...
iOS App Store General Feature JoeBlue

Apple 'Records Every Tap' in App Store to Filter New Personalized Recommendations Feature

Wednesday June 17, 2026 6:27 am PDT by
Last week, Apple introduced a new discovery feature for the App Store called Personalized Collections, or app recommendations based on individual interests and behavior. Apple pitched the announcement as another way for developers to have their app discovered, but there has already been some pushback from a privacy perspective. App Store user analytics collected by Apple (Image: Mysk) The new ...
iOS App Store Icons

Apple Announces Major App Store Changes on iOS in Brazil

Thursday June 18, 2026 8:50 am PDT by
Apple today announced that developers in Brazil will be allowed to distribute iPhone apps through alternative app marketplaces on iOS, and accept payments through third-party platforms. In other words, developers in Brazil will be able to circumvent the App Store and Apple's in-app purchase system, but there are still fees. Alternative app marketplaces will have to be authorized by Apple and ...

Top Rated Comments

2 weeks ago
I'm in the UK.

Yes, to all of this.

Generally in the 'free market' economies - and I put quotes around that as all of our free market economies do have regulation - we take the view that a first mover in a market does not have a right to keep on profiting from that virtually indefinitely, for the health of market competitiveness and consumer choice.

Anyway, we've all debated this point endlessly in this forum. I know that some will vehemently agree with me and that's ok. I'm a random person on the internet with a random opinion.

I partially buy Apple's arguments about user safety.

Similarly to how does in the App Store, it could have an 'official payment partner' programme, where it runs some checks on payment providers.

For example in the UK, we have a financial regulator who already does checks like this.

But why the deafening silence from Apple on taking such an approach?

I think that we can all guess why.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
surferfb Avatar
2 weeks ago

The regulator said any fees Apple and Google charge developers for enabling such "steering" must be fair and reasonable, remain below existing App Store and Play Store commissions, and allow developers to either pass savings on to consumers or reinvest them in innovation.
Pass them along to consumers or reinvest them? Absolute proof regulators have no idea what they’re talking about.

I’m old enough to remember when the EU said the DMA was going to lower prices for consumers and then Spotify immediately went and raised prices on EU customers. I’m sure that just slipped UK regulators minds, given it was a long time six months ago.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
2 weeks ago
Apple need oversight to avoid becoming a monopoly. It can't be trusted to always make the right decisions in the best interests of customers and profits - fairly.

That said - Do I trust the UK, the US, the EU to do this in a way less biased to their own agendas than Apples own? Absolutely not, they're all crooked and driven by spectators who have pockets to fill.

EDIT: I'm astonished at some of the users who will defend apple no matter what. Saying Apple need some sort of oversight isn't treason, it isn't trolling, it's common sense.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Will Co Avatar
2 weeks ago

Apple need oversight to avoid becoming a monopoly. It can't be trusted to always make the right decisions in the best interests of customers and profits - fairly.

That said - Do I trust the UK, the US, the EU to do this in a way less biased to their own agendas than Apples own? Absolutely not, they're all crooked and driven by spectators who have pockets to fill.
A very sensible comment that I wholeheartedly agree with. History has shown that big tech, no matter how benign it appears, has often wandered off down a path that protects or serves its own interests rather than those of its customers. This becomes a problem at scale, when entire societies are built on that technology. It is absolutely right for those societies governments to seek to ensure fairness and openness. However, history has also shown that those same governments often get it badly wrong and overreach. I'm not sure it's always down to crookedness or being driven by greedy spectators, although I absolutely accept this could well be the case in some circumstances. For the most part the EU, for example, just seems to go off down a technological rabbit-whole that started out well meaning but ends up being arguably worse than the original problem. The UK government just seems to lurch from one badly advised and idiotic position to the next (ADP, anyone?), and that's coming from a UK national.

[Edited: typos]
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Shalev Lazarof Avatar
2 weeks ago

They're highly educated people who may not have ever worked in the field or for a top 100 company, but they do likely have a basic degree and that's enough apparently. I'm sure the innovators of the world love being told they're doing it wrong by somebody with such experience.
My doctor is highly educated as well, but he have no clue of what is a product and how it should operate or be used
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Shalev Lazarof Avatar
2 weeks ago
So Apple, the only company in the world built on a 50 years old culture, who is again, the ONLY one capable of delivering all those rich ecosystem platforms we enjoy as mere mortals today and not using plastic Nokia "phones" and beige frustrating windows fragmented crappy "computers", should LISTEN to The U.K.'s competition regulator who probably have no idea about the creativity and deep engineering knowledge necessary in order to create those highly integrated insane attention to details consumer electronics devices and services, who created this all App world with all the quality control and privacy protections and laid the foundation to the mobile reality we live in today, is that what's going on here?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)