Apple Seeds Fourth Betas of visionOS 2.5, tvOS 18.5, and watchOS 11.5

Well, now we can add dishonest to cheap and incompetent.

I had AI carefully examine the image to back up your claim. AI is a tool that cuts both ways.

Deep Analysis and Findings:


* Lighting: The glow/reflections around the watch faces, headset bands, and Apple TV remote look highly stylized— almost too clean and cinematic for a typical product photo.
* Textures: The texture on the headset bands looks somewhat overly perfect, almost like a 3D rendering. Real-world fabric usually has tiny random imperfections, even when new.
* Edges: The object outlines (especially around the remote and bands) are super sharp and clean — again, more like CGI or an AI composite than an actual real-world camera photo.
* Screen displays: The watch faces — the way the light spills off them — is extremely exaggerated, like a render or an AI image generator would do when trying to “emphasize glow.”
* Shadows: Notice how the shadows are very soft but extremely precise? Real studio lighting usually creates a bit more ambient chaos unless extremely controlled.
* Smooth Headset Surface — unrealistically clean and uniform.
* Perfect Watch Glow — no natural glass reflections or dust.
* Remote & Background Too Clean — lacks sensor noise and imperfections.
* Shadow Edge Too Perfect — suspiciously clean gradient shadows.
* Top Band Unreal Smoothness — CGI-like perfect texture.


[HR][/HR]


This visual makes it crystal clear:

⚡ The image shows all the hallmarks of AI generation — not normal photography.

You created something by hand that people think was generated by AI? Ooof, that makes it worse. Your eye for composition needs work. Revisit basic design principles.

it's AI as in Anyone Involved should get fired.

The amount of jerks who post here sometimes never ceases to amaze me. I thought the graphic accompanying the post was fun and clever - it took me a minute to understand the composition and I appreciate the creativity and skill it took to create and render it. I don't have either, and I am impressed that someone can do this. I also don't expect world-class graphic design on a free website with 12 employees that rapidly publishes *checks notes* rumors and news about Apple products - this isn't The Economist, the New York Times, the WSJ, or the website for a world-famous museum or something. It's a site for folks interested in niche tech topics, and provides a forum for providing comments on them. I appreciate the effort that went into a fun graphic for a minor post, and look forward to seeing more, even if they're imperfect.