Epic Games Accuses Apple of Charging 'Unjustified Fees' for Required Non-App Store Purchase Link

Epic Games is once again after Apple, this time accusing the Cupertino company of violating a court ruling that requires Apple to allow developers to offer in-app links to direct customers to third-party purchase options on the web.

app store blue banner epic 1
Apple tweaked its U.S. App Store policies back in January, and developers are permitted to put one link in their apps that leads to a website where customers can make a purchase without using the in-app purchase system. Apple is still charging commission for these purchases, requiring developers to pay between 12 and 27 percent (three percent lower than the 15/30 standard fee).

‌Epic Games‌ is unhappy with the fee that Apple continues to charge, today telling the court that Apple has not complied with the order, and asking that Apple be held in contempt of court. ‌Epic Games‌ claims that the fees make the links "commercially unusable," thereby subverting the injunction.

Apple violates the Injunction in three ways. First, with respect to External Links, Apple has imposed new fees and enacted a slew of new rules that work together to make the links commercially unusable. This new fee and accompanying web of restrictions subverts the purpose of the Injunction, allowing Apple to continue extracting its excessive commissions and making it effectively impossible for a developer to inform users about, and direct users toward, an alternative platform for making a purchase.

Second, Apple continues to categorically prohibit any steering using "buttons" or "other calls to action". Specifically, Apple does not allow External Links that resemble a "button" in any way.

Third, Apple's Guideline 3.1.3 still prohibits certain apps, including all multiplatform services (i.e., apps that operate across multiple platforms and allow users to access the same content across these platforms, including popular games such as Minecraft), from "within the app, encourag[ing] users to use a purchasing method other than in-app purchase". This language expressly contravenes the Injunction by prohibiting any steering to alternative purchasing methods.

‌Epic Games‌ collected statements from other developers that have spoken out against Apple's App Store fees, including Paddle CEO Christian Owens and Down Dog CEO Benjamin Simon.

Apple was initially ordered to make the ‌App Store‌ changes in 2021 as part of its court battle with ‌Epic Games‌. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers, who oversaw the case, took issue with Apple's anti-steering rules. Apple was able to delay implementing the ‌App Store‌ changes for a few years while it appealed, but none of the courts decided to change the verdict. Apple ultimately took it to the Supreme Court, but the court declined to hear the case, so Apple had to comply immediately at the beginning of the year.

Apple has said that it is fully in compliance with the injunction. From Apple's January statement of compliance:

As of January 16, 2024, Apple has fully complied with the Injunction: It is striking the relevant parts of the App Store Review Guidelines applicable to apps on the U.S. storefronts of the iOS and iPadOS App Stores and implementing new rules that permit developers to (i) include in their apps buttons or links with calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms in addition to IAP and (ii) communicate with customers through points of contact obtained voluntarily from customers through account registration within the app. As a result of these changes, developers have the option of informing consumers, both within and outside the app, about alternative purchase mechanisms in addition to IAP.

‌Epic Games‌ claims that the fee Apple charges for the link is "financially unattractive" for developers who want to choose another payment solution, and it "prevents any meaningful competition between payment solutions." The company wants the court to require Apple to bring its policies into compliance with the injunction.

Popular Stories

iOS 26 on Three iPhones

iOS 26 Public Beta Expected This Week as First iOS 27 Rumor Surfaces

Sunday July 20, 2025 7:36 am PDT by
The first iOS 26 public beta should arrive this week, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. "All indications are that iOS 26 should go into the public beta phase this coming week," said Gurman, in his Power On newsletter today. In a social media post last week, Gurman said that the iOS 26 public beta would likely be released on or around Wednesday, July 23. Apple previously announced...
CarPlay Liquid Glass Dark

iOS 26's Biggest CarPlay Feature Was Quietly Hiding on Apple's Website

Monday July 21, 2025 7:45 am PDT by
Apple recently announced that iPhone users will soon be able to watch videos right on the CarPlay screen in supported vehicles. This is arguably the biggest new CarPlay feature coming with the iOS 26 update later this year, and yet Apple did not even mention it during its WWDC 2025 keynote last month. Instead, it was buried on Apple's developer website. iPhone users will be able to...
Generic iPhone 17 Feature With Full Width Dynamic Island

iPhone 17 Series Is Less Than Two Months Away: Everything We Know

Friday July 18, 2025 4:23 am PDT by
Apple is expected to hold its annual iPhone announcement event during the week of September 8, 2025, with September 9 or 10 emerging as the most likely dates. Like the iPhone 16 series, this year's lineup is expected to include four models – but with a twist. The ‌Plus device is being replaced with an all-new ultra-thin model, while the iPhone 17 Pro and ‌iPhone 17 Pro‌ Max are set to...
CarPlay Ultra Climate Controls

Apple Says These Automakers Will Offer CarPlay Ultra

Friday July 18, 2025 1:47 pm PDT by
A few months ago, Apple announced the launch of CarPlay Ultra, the long-awaited next-generation version of CarPlay. CarPlay Ultra is currently limited to newer Aston Martin vehicles in the U.S. and Canada. Fortunately, if you cannot afford a $250,000 luxury vehicle, the software system will eventually be available in more affordable vehicles. Apple said "many" other automakers around...
ios 19 messages app

Apple Sues Jon Prosser Over iOS 26 Leaks

Thursday July 17, 2025 8:40 pm PDT by
Earlier this year, YouTuber Jon Prosser shared multiple videos showing off what he claimed to be re-created renderings of what was then presumed to be called iOS 19 and which was eventually unveiled by Apple as iOS 26 at WWDC in June. In his first video back in January, Prosser showed off a Camera app redesign with a simpler set of buttons for moving between photo and video modes, and he...
ipad pro 2024

New iPad Pro Expected This Year With M5 Chip and Two Front Cameras

Sunday July 20, 2025 6:26 am PDT by
Apple's next-generation iPad Pro models will be equipped with two front-facing cameras, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In his Power On newsletter today, Gurman said the upcoming iPad Pro models with the M5 chip will have both portrait and landscape cameras, letting you capture photos and go on video calls without having to worry about the device's orientation. The current iPad Pro...
iOS 26 Feature

iOS 26 Public Beta Appears Imminent Based on This Latest Hint

Monday July 21, 2025 7:32 pm PDT by
An anonymous leaker with a proven track record today shared alleged build numbers for the fourth developer betas of iOS 26 and more. The private account on X has accurately leaked build numbers for Apple software updates in the past. We do not link to the account at the owner's request. Here are all of the build numbers shared by the account today: iOS 26 and iPadOS 26 beta 4 (23A5297i)...

Top Rated Comments

threeseed Avatar
18 months ago

I don't see why Apple should get a commission for in-app purchases when they're not handling the payment transaction. Epic is right again. You may not like them, but some company or other needed to make these arguments in court and I'm glad they're doing it.
a) Because Apple has a right to charge a fee for its SDKs. Same as Epic does with Unreal Engine.

b) Many companies over the years have brought up these arguments in court. They all fail because it's completely legal to charge a fee for people to use your products and services.

c) At no point is anyone forcing Epic to develop for iOS and at no point did anyone force them to sign the agreement between themselves and Apple.
Score: 73 Votes (Like | Disagree)
m4mario Avatar
18 months ago
Apple has never prevented any company from using non-proprietary technologies to develop and distribute apps on Apple devices.

HTML 5 is an open standard. Java script is available widely. Any company can develop a web app, and distribute it on any 3rd party App Store developed with a similar technology, without paying Apple a dime, or getting Apple’s approval.

What Apple asked for, is if they use Apple technologies, like XCode, iOS SDKs, etc, to pay a commission on digital goods sold. Which almost every big company running subscriptions has bypassed now. Netflix, YouTube or Spotify, do not pay Apple a commission because they are signing up outside the App. And all the banking & finance apps, car apps, bakery apps, shopping apps, etc. They don’t pay Apple anything as well (other than the extremely low $100 a year membership). As they are not selling digital goods.

All this nonsense about 3rd party App Stores and external payment mechanisms are not about giving any real choice to the end-user or companies.

They are just about using Apple’s technologies for free. They want to use Xcode, Apple SDKs and all the polish for their apps that comes with using it, Apple training, Apple engineers’ time, the recognition and reachability that comes from the Apple App Store, all the vetting & advertising that Apple does to achieve it, etc. But they want it for free.

And The EU just making up special rules to do it, is nothing but forced extortion of Apple’s proprietary technologies.

In the process, they don’t care if they break down the trust and no-nonsense experience users buy Apple products for. Or maybe they do want to break it down.

There is little the Apple user in EU (or outside) stands to gain from these, other than a loss in quality of the ecosystem they’ve paid all these years for, just as much as Apple has worked hard building it.
Score: 65 Votes (Like | Disagree)
gatorvet96 Avatar
18 months ago
Does Epic allow developers for games on Epic's game store to advertise payment outside of their store?
Score: 58 Votes (Like | Disagree)
erikkfi Avatar
18 months ago
I don't see why Apple should get a commission for in-app purchases when they're not handling the payment transaction. Epic is right again. You may not like them, but some company or other needed to make these arguments in court and I'm glad they're doing it.
Score: 50 Votes (Like | Disagree)
surfzen21 Avatar
18 months ago
At this rate I'm surprised Epic games isn't demanding that Apple pay them for the "privilege" of Epic putting their games on Apples platform.
Score: 46 Votes (Like | Disagree)
LeeW Avatar
18 months ago
I don't like Epic and their persistent whining, but they are right.
Score: 41 Votes (Like | Disagree)