U.S. ITC Launches Investigation Into Capacitive Devices Made by Apple and Others Following Patent Infringement Complaint

The United States International Trade Commission today announced an investigation into possible patent violations involving capacitive touch-controlled devices, computers, and components created by Apple, Amazon, Samsung, and others, reports Reuters.

iphone 11 and 11 pro
According to a document announcing the investigation [PDF], it stems from a February complaint filed by Irish company Neodron claiming Apple and other companies are infringing on Neodron-owned patents related to touch-based devices.

The investigation is based on a complaint filed by Neodron, Ltd., of Dublin, Ireland, on February 14, 2020. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States and sale of certain capacitive touch-controlled mobile devices, computers, and components thereof that infringe patents asserted by the complainant. The complainant requests that the USITC issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.

The ITC will investigate the complaint, which involves Amazon, Apple, ASUSTek, ASUS computer International, LG Electronics, LG Electronics USA, Microsoft, Motorola, Samsung, Sony, and Sony Mobile Communications to determine if there have been patent violations under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Neodron is ultimately seeking a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders against the companies involved in the investigation. The ITC says that the launch of the investigation does not mean that a decision has been made on the merits of the case.

The case will be assigned to an administrative law judge who will schedule and hold an evidentiary hearing to make an initial determination as to whether there is indeed a patent infringement issue.

The U.S. ITC previously announced a similar investigation into touch-controlled devices, computers, and components in June, but Apple was not part of that particular investigation, which has now been expanded.

Popular Stories

iPhone 17 Pro Render Front Page Tech

iPhone 17 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 8 New Features

Tuesday March 4, 2025 3:15 pm PST by
While the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max are not expected to launch until September, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. iPhone 17 Pro's alleged design via Front Page Tech Below, we recap key changes rumored for the iPhone 17 Pro models as of March 2025: Aluminum frame: iPhone 17 Pro models are rumored to have an aluminum frame, whereas the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone...
iPhone 16 Pro vs iPhone 17 Air Feature

iPhone 17 Air and 17 Pro Max Allegedly Same Size Apart From Thickness

Friday March 7, 2025 2:45 am PST by
Apple's all-new ultra-thin iPhone 17 Air shares the same dimensions as the iPhone 17 Pro Max, with the only difference being in the thickness of the devices, according to the leaker Ice Universe. Posting to their Weibo account, the Chinese leaker today claimed that the iPhone 17 Air and iPhone 17 Pro Max have identical body length, width, screen size, and bezels. "The only difference is the...
Apple Intelligence General Feature

Apple Delays Apple Intelligence Siri Features

Friday March 7, 2025 9:35 am PST by
Apple is delaying some of the Apple Intelligence Siri features that it expected to release in iOS 18, an Apple spokesperson said in a statement to Daring Fireball. Apple says that it is going to take longer than expected to roll out the more personalized Siri experience, and that these features will be rolled out "in the coming year.""Siri helps our users find what they need and get things...
Apple MacBook Air hero

Apple Says New MacBook Air Up to 23x Faster Than Intel-Based Model, But Read the Fine Print

Thursday March 6, 2025 1:46 pm PST by
Apple has a staggering marketing claim for the new MacBook Air with the M4 chip. Specifically, Apple says the new MacBook Air is up to 23x faster than the last Intel-based model. However, there are some details in the fine print to be aware of. First, Apple said it compared a new 2025 MacBook Air with a 10-core M4 chip and 32GB of RAM to a 2020 MacBook Air with a quad-core Intel Core i7...
iphone 17 pro asherdipps

iPhone 17 Pro Max Said to Be Thicker to Accommodate Larger Battery

Friday March 7, 2025 2:47 am PST by
Apple has increased the thickness of the upcoming iPhone 17 Pro Max compared to the current generation iPhone 16 Pro Max, claims the Chinese leaker known as Ice Universe. Apple is said to have increased the depth of the iPhone 17 Pro Max to 8.725mm, up from 8.25mm on the iPhone 16 Pro Max, which would be a 0.475mm difference in thickness. The increase "surely means a larger battery,"...
Apple MacBook Air hero

New MacBook Air Quietly Fixes This Decades-Long Design Oversight

Friday March 7, 2025 6:58 am PST by
In a move that probably won't make headlines but should delight detail-oriented Mac users everywhere, Apple has quietly corrected a 26-year-old design inconsistency on its keyboards. The Mute key, a staple on Mac keyboards since the PowerBook G3 'Lombard' debuted in 1999, has finally received a logical redesign on the new MacBook Air with M4 chip. As spotted by iCulture, the key now displays ...
ipad air magic keyboard feature

Everything Apple Announced This Week

Wednesday March 5, 2025 4:03 pm PST by
It's been a busy week for Apple, with new products announced on Tuesday and Wednesday. We're now caught up on what's been rumored for a spring launch, so we thought we'd recap everything Apple came out with this week. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. iPad Air Apple updated the iPad Air on Tuesday, updating it with the new M3 chip. The iPad Air still comes in...
2016 12 inch macbook feature

Apple Introduced Its Most Controversial MacBook 10 Years Ago Today

Sunday March 9, 2025 1:00 am PST by
Apple announced the infamous 12-inch Retina MacBook a decade ago today, an experimental new Mac that was as controversial as it was revolutionary. Apple unveiled the 12-inch MacBook on March 9, 2015, at the "Spring Forward" event in San Francisco, California. The event was primarily focused on the Apple Watch, which was being fully detailed ahead of its launch the following month, so the...
Apple Summer 2025 Feature 1

Here Are the New Apple Products We're Expecting This Summer

Friday March 7, 2025 7:09 am PST by
Now that Apple has announced its new more affordable iPhone 16e, and new MacBook Air and Mac Studio models with M4 and M3 Ultra chips, we thought we'd provide a quick recap of what else we are expecting from the company in the summer months ahead. There are at least three product categories that we are hoping to see some movement in before summer is over, but of course, nothing is...

Top Rated Comments

az431 Avatar
65 months ago

Patent trolls deserve corona.
The fact that someone seeks to enforce a patent automatically makes them a patent troll?

And even if they were, what’s the difference? Under patent law, you either own a valid and enforceable patent or you don’t. End of story.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
gsmornot Avatar
65 months ago
I know how this company feels. I have a patent I am getting ready to file on. “Battery inside device”. Each company that put the battery inside has infringed on my idea. Wish me luck.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mannyvel Avatar
65 months ago
Wow, that's going to be one heck of a patent win. Everything today uses a capacitive touchscreen, including in-car displays.

The problem is the patent was filed in 2009, and the iPhone came out in 2007. It could be that it covers new development in capacitive screens. It would be relatively easy for Apple to argue prior art on this...or demonstrate indemnification by the people that supply Apple with the screens.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
triscuitbiscuit Avatar
65 months ago

The fact that someone seeks to enforce a patent automatically makes them a patent troll?

And even if they were, what’s the difference? Under patent law, you either own a valid and enforceable patent or you don’t. End of story.
It's because it is bad faith. Patent trolls don't actually do anything of import. They simply exploit laws. If there was something legitimate like Ford copying a patent that Chevy did- that is what patents are intended for. But a company that acts as a patent troll has zero intention of actually putting a patent to use.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ulyssesric Avatar
65 months ago
A few interesting factors:

1. This law suite was initially started in May 29, 2019, and the initial target is Lenova, then all the others were involved.

2. All the patents were initially owned by Atmel, then transferred to Microchip when they merged Atmel, then acquired by Neodron Ltd at the end of Dec, 2018.

3. The suitor, Neodron Ltd, just opened for business few days ago, on Dec 18, 2018.

In other words, this is either a plotted operation against some specific target by you-know-who, or a very disgusting patent troll case.


The fact that someone seeks to enforce a patent automatically makes them a patent troll?
No, but a company that was established just few days before the acquisition of these patents, and they started law suite immediately after acquiring these patents, and they're not doing any kind of business at all except these law suites, that automatically makes it a patent troll.


And even if they were, what’s the difference? Under patent law, you either own a valid and enforceable patent or you don’t. End of story.
No it's far from end. You're the patent owner doesn't mean you can do anything you want. Under patent law, your patent could be invalidated. In U.S., there are 5 ways to claim invalidation on a patent: Prior Art, Proof of Sale or Public Use, Improper Formation, Inventor’s Oath, and Break in Priority Chain. A patent troll case like this is highly possible to be canceled by the fifth rule.

Investigate the detail before rush replying.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
GeoStructural Avatar
65 months ago

The fact that someone seeks to enforce a patent automatically makes them a patent troll?

And even if they were, what’s the difference? Under patent law, you either own a valid and enforceable patent or you don’t. End of story.
For so many people here Apple is never at fault.

People have complained in this forum that Qualcom’s royalties are on the verge of being illegal yet Apple charges a fee to use their old lightning cable and they find that more reasonable.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)