Skip to Content

Google Follows Apple's Lead By Reducing Play Store Fee for App Subscriptions

by

Google revealed on Thursday that it would follow Apple's lead in lowering the amount of money app developers must pay for mobile subscriptions processed through the company's Play Store (via The Verge).

Adoption of the subscription model by iOS developers has increased over recent months, causing some controversy within the app-using community. Apple incentivized developers to sell their apps for a recurring fee instead of a one-time cost when it made changes to its App Store subscription policies in September of last year.

google play store 16
Usually, Apple takes 30 percent of app revenue, but developers who are able to maintain a subscription with a customer longer than a year see Apple's cut drop down to 15 percent.

Google is adopting the same policy for subscriptions in its Play Store – an Android developer selling a subscription service will be eligible for the cut if the customer in question has been subscribed for more than a year. The company plans to bring the change into effect starting January 2018.

As The Verge notes, Google is trying to stay competitive with Apple by offering a reduction in its fees. This way the company ensures that subscription services like Spotify don't try to bypass the Play Store in an effort to avoid paying the fee. But it also encourages developers to work harder to keep users subscribed for longer, given that the free reduction doesn't take effect until 12 months into the initial subscription.

Top Rated Comments

109 months ago
I understand Devs need to keep an income stream but every time a paid app switches to subscription without putting it in the changelog, I immediately delete and never look back.
Geocaching, Hi-Definitely Radar, and several other apps pulled this. It's not as big of an issue when a free app switched to subscription but I paid for those and felt robbed when they wanted me to pay for what I already paid for.

$1-$10 a month isn't that bad on its own but when I have 20-30 apps nagging for monthly payments (especially after I paid for the original, full featured version) it gets pretty expensive.

There are a ton of cool apps I would love to use but ended up not buying a iPad pro because of the subscriptions for all these apps (and the $50 price increase).
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
109 months ago
I understand Devs need to keep an income stream but every time a paid app switches to subscription without putting it in the changelog, I immediately delete and never look back.
Geocaching, Hi-Definitely Radar, and several other apps pulled this. It's not as big of an issue when a free app switched to subscription but I paid for those and felt robbed when they wanted me to pay for what I already paid for.

$1-$10 a month isn't that bad on its own but when I have 20-30 apps nagging for monthly payments (especially after I paid for the original, full featured version) it gets pretty expensive.

There are a ton of cool apps I would love to use but ended up not buying a iPad pro because of the subscriptions for all these apps (and the $50 price increase).
As a long-time iOS app developer myself I can sympathize with you. Our company is going through the same problems right now where we may switch to a subscription model.

Honestly, we wish there was a better way, but when users get mad and complain that our full-featured app that took more than a few years to make costs the same as a McDonalds Happy Meal, it's frustrating for the developer. It's almost just not worth it (almost), especially for niche apps.

I wish Apple would allow devs to charge for major updates (2.0 -> 3.0) in an easier way beyond just releasing an entirely new app to the store.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...