Skip to Content

European Commission Made 'Fundamental Errors' in Irish Tax Ruling, Says Apple

EU apple taxApple has claimed that the European Commission made "fundamental errors" when it ruled last year that the company owed Ireland 13 billion euros ($13.7 billion) in unpaid taxes plus interest.

Apple appealed the commission's decision in December, but on Monday the company published a piece in the Official Journal of the European Union detailing 14 pleas in law to support its action, according to The Irish Times.

The European Commission argues that Irish revenue commissioners gave Apple unfair advantage between 1991 and 2007 by allowing the company to move income from the European market through two "non-resident" head office subsidiaries based in Ireland.

Apple and the Irish government, which has also appealed the commission's decision, argue that the bulk of those profits are due in the U.S.

"The Commission made fundamental errors by failing to recognize that the applicants' profit-driving activities, in particular the development and commercialization of the intellectual property (Apple IP), were controlled and managed in the United States," Apple said, according to the Official Journal. "The profits from those activities are attributable to the United States, not Ireland."

Apple maintained that the commission had "failed to recognize that the Irish branches carried out only routine functions and were not involved in the development and commercialization of Apple IP, which drove profits".

Cupertino also said that the commission failed to conduct a diligent and impartial investigation, and "exceeded its competence" as it relates to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, by "attempting to redesign Ireland's corporate tax system".

Apple CEO Tim Cook has called the EC's ruling "total political crap" and described the lower end 0.005% tax rate Apple is accused of paying as a "false number". The Apple CEO believes that the decision will be reversed.

Appeals by Apple and the Irish government have been made to the European Union's General Court, where proceedings may take up to two years to complete, after which the case is likely to go all the way to the European Court of Justice.

Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...
HomePod mini and Apple TV Sage

New Apple TV and HomePod Mini Are Still Missing, Here's Why

Thursday March 5, 2026 6:11 am PST by
Apple this week unveiled seven products, ranging from the iPhone 17e to the MacBook Neo, but new Apple TV and HomePod mini models were not among them. Given that there have been rumors about the next-generation Apple TV and HomePod mini since all the way back in late 2024, some customers are wondering why the devices have yet to launch, and the answer likely relates to Siri. In September, ...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...

Top Rated Comments

118 months ago
Apple CEO Tim Cook has called the EC's ruling "total political crap ('https://www.macrumors.com/2016/09/01/tim-cook-tax-total-political-crap/')" and described the lower end 0.005% tax rate Apple is accused of paying as a "false number".
Instead of trying to cloud the waters Tim, how about coming clean on what tax rate you actually pay?
No, didn't think so...

EDIT: For clarification, when I say "you" I am referring to Apple. Not Tims personal tax rate.
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
bladerunner2000 Avatar
118 months ago
Apple is happy to benefit from them though. Anything not to pay it's fair share in taxes in USA.

What a lovely company... such integrity.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
niun Avatar
118 months ago
"You publish your tax return first, please."
Is the other poster
a. A huge tech corporation with dodgy tax dealings in Ireland?
b. Currently under investigation by the EU?

No? Didn't think so..

I'd also like to see Tim come clean on Apple's tax in Ireland and around the world for that matter.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
niun Avatar
118 months ago
Don't Apple pay their fair share of taxes in the US?

I was under the impression that everything it sold in the US was taxed there. Everything sold abroad was taxed abroad - unless Apple brings its offshore cash to the US.

Not trying to start an argument - honestly asking if there's something I've missed.
From what I have worked out in my small brain.

Everything sold in U.S. is taxed in US..
Everything sold abroad (E.U.) is put through an IP ringer so that's it's not taxed in any country apart from Ireland. It's taxed there at 0.005% or another criminally low number thanks to the head office being there in name only.
Apple are saying that the cash offshore is supposed to be taxed at the very high U.S. tax rate if and when they bring it home so in theory they are paying whatever the U.S. corporation tax is.. Just not whilst the cash is outside of the U.S.
[doublepost=1487681906][/doublepost]
This ruling is intended to extract the billions from the US Treasury and transfer it to the EU.
Bollox.
Just think how much cash the U.S. treasury would be bringing in if Apple were forced to bring that cash home?

And for any who say, "The government shouldn't be trusted with taxes, they just waste the cash". Apple are doing NOTHING with it.. That could be repairing roads, bridges, providing schools, hospitals etc...
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ILikeAllOS Avatar
118 months ago
If I have to pay my taxes then so do you Apple.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
118 months ago
If the profits were attibuted by Apple to the U.S. and accordingly taxed in the U.S. I side with Apple on this point. If the profits were originally attributed to Ireland it's a different story but it would be like Apple telling U.S. tax autorithies they need to get taxed in Ireland and EU authorities they need to get taxed in the U.S...
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)