Skip to Content

Apple Removes Some Ad Blockers From App Store for Installing Root Certificates

by

appstoreApple tonight removed some ad blockers, among other apps, from the App Store for installing root certificates that would allow developers to view encrypted traffic from their users, reports iMore. In a statement provided to the publication, Apple said it was working with developers to get the apps back into the App Store.

Apple is deeply committed to protecting customer privacy and security. We’ve removed a few apps from the App Store that install root certificates which enable the monitoring of customer network data that can in turn be used to compromise SSL/TLS security solutions. We are working closely with these developers to quickly get their apps back on the App Store, while ensuring customer privacy and security is not at risk.

With iOS 9, Apple allowed developers to create content blockers that would block ads on websites in Safari. Some ad blockers were removed because they could use the installed root certificates to view customer data passing through them. However, iMore notes that the ad blockers removed from the App Store are slightly different than the content blockers Apple enabled with iOS 9.

The ad blockers removed from the App Store block ads and other content inside apps by "exposing all your private Internet traffic to the blocker," according to iMore. The apps are set up in a way that allows a user's traffic to flow through the developer's servers to perform the content blocking. One of the apps that has been removed is Been Choice, who notes that they will resubmit their app tomorrow with the necessary changes.

While Apple has enabled developers to create content blockers for Safari, it currently has no systems in place to allow developers to block content within apps.

Top Rated Comments

btrach144 Avatar
136 months ago
Where is the list of removed apps???
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
136 months ago
Apple should not be allowing these developers back in to the App Store.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
MacHiavelli Avatar
136 months ago
Can we have a review with recommendations for safe ad blockers in iOS. The changes in iOS 9 have left very muddied waters, let alone with apps being launched and then pulled by the developer or Apple.

Mess. Mess. Mess.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mw360 Avatar
136 months ago
Can we have a review with recommendations for safe ad blockers in iOS. The changes in iOS 9 have left very muddied waters, let alone with apps being launched and then pulled by the developer or Apple.

Mess. Mess. Mess.
This isn't the mess it appears to be.

iOS9 introduced ways to block ads which didn't compromise privacy. The old ad blockers which used insecure methods have been now been pulled and/or updated. End of story.

Oh, one developer pulled his safe ad blocker because he felt bad about it.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
0815 Avatar
136 months ago
i need something to block Iads.
I only dont like bad intrusive ads that are in your face, like the admob/ Google garbage that is forced full screen with auto play videos in your face after every short game play. iAd on the other hand just sits there without annoying me and allows me to get free apps - I even click on them in support of very good games.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
136 months ago
What happened is that some of the adblockers installed their own root certificate, so they could perform what resembles a man-in-the-middle attack on user's SSL-encrypted traffic. Installing a root certificate enables the proxy at the remote end of the VPN to replace the original encryption keys offered by an HTTPS web site with their own, without the user having any way of detecting this. After replacing the keys, they can see all the user's SSL-encrypted traffic (potentially including things like passwords entered in banking apps etc.).

Even if we assume this was well-intentioned (i.e. the adblocker dev only wanted to make sure that adblocking works on encrypted sites/apps too), this is a very dubious proposition, as most non-technical people won't expect this. At the very least the blocker needs to make it very clear to the user that their end-to-end encryption is being broken.

It's worth repeating that this issue does *not* affect bockers that use the new iOS 9 content blocker mechanism, such as the ones listed in the first post in this thread:

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/the-ios-9-content-blocker-thread.1916783/
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...