verizon 2 fee1
A Droid-Life story from yesterday has generated a lot of complaints about Verizon's billing practices. The site posted a Verizon memo that detailed a new "convenience" charge that the company would be charing for online payments.

Big Red will start charging you a $2 fee both over the phone and online for your monthly bill transaction unless you have your account set up to pay automatically.

Those enrolled in auto-pay or pay by mail or electronic check will avoid the fees. The new charges kick in on January 15th.

Top Rated Comments

scaredpoet Avatar
174 months ago
I suppose if you want to live your life paranoid like that.
It's not about paranoia. It's about being able to determine when MY money ends up in someone else's hands as opposed to giving someone carte blanche to dip in as they please.

It's also about well-documented, frequent cases of site hacking and stealing of this information.

However, if you're perfectly fine with as many different billers having your bank account information, and have that much money that you don't care who can go in and take it, well that's on you. Whatever floats your boat.

So make the payments through your bank's website. Same process, different website. *so hard to do*
And some people will do this. that still doesn't make the practice reasonable.

I actually don't have Verizon, so I couldn't honestly care less about this fee.
I don't have Verizon either, but I do care because recent history has shown that the carriers like to collude. If one carrier introduces a new fee or adds a new plan restriction, the others have a tendency to follow suit.

I just get annoyed when people complain about stuff without reason, which is what people are doing here.
When a company charges its customers more and gives a BS reason for doing it, that's plenty of reason to complain. Acquiescence only gives such entities motivation to go further and charge more. Maybe you like to needlessly spend money, or spend extra time going through hoops to avoid such fees. Some of us don't.


Here, let me save you your reply: *whine whine whine*
How nice it must be in your little world. I find it amusing that for someone who doesn't have Verizon service, you're working this hard to defend a corporate practice that seeks only to grab more money from people.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
EricNau Avatar
174 months ago
Stop whining and be smart consumers.
Smart customers complain when a company does something unreasonable.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
takeshi74 Avatar
174 months ago
I suppose if you want to live your life paranoid like that.
Not blindly assuming that corporations have your best interest in mind != paranoia.

I just get annoyed when people complain about stuff without reason, which is what people are doing here.
So you complain about people complaining? Pot, kettle.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
wordoflife Avatar
174 months ago
Just saw this on twitter
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-57349742-266/verizon-wireless-yep-thatll-be-$2-to-pay-your-bill-online/

A leaked memo from the company first reported by Engadget, showed some of the details of the new plan. And the blog Phone Scoop got confirmation from a Verizon representative on Thursday of the change.
The new fee will go into effect starting January 15 and doesn't apply to customers paying their bills with an electronic check or who enroll in autopay using a credit, debit, or AT&T cards, according to the memo posted on Endgadget. Customers using Verizon Wireless gift cards or Verizon Wireless device rebate cards and customers using standard paper check and money orders made payable directly to Verizon Wireless will also not be charged a fee, Phone Scoop reported.
Verizon said that customers making single payments online will be notified of the fee before they complete their transactions.
The fee associated with paying your bill online is part of a larger trend by companies to extract more money from customers to access certain forms of payment. Bank of America was criticized earlier this year for its plans to charge customers a $5 fee to use debit cards.
Verizon's plan seems to make little sense, given that the company offers several ways to avoid the fee. Verizon didn't elaborate on why it's charging this fee. My guess is that the company that clears these payments is charging Verizon a fee that Verizon is passing on to customers. Still, it seems ridiculous that paying a bill online or by phone could cost Verizon more than processing a hand-written check or money order that is sent to the company through the regular mail.
Verizon has not yet responded to CNET's request for more information on this topic. So stay tuned for updates.
I hate how greedy carriers have become. This is just ridiculous. It's just pure greed, that is all.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
NikeTalk Avatar
174 months ago
I don't care how long you write an explanation or try to make this logical it's not right. Should we also cover Verizon's operating cost just because we decided to choose them as our wireless provider too?? If you go into business and want to accept electronic payments, unless you process them yourself you know there is a fee associated with this. What makes it acceptable to pass this on to the customer and make it so OBVIOUS?

But I have the option to sign up for auto-pay, when my bill could be incorrect? I wouldn't even wanna know the hoops i'd have to hop thru just to get a refund. Gee thanks, why don't I just pay the life of the contract upfront when I sign up?
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ggmissmolly Avatar
174 months ago
Give'em hell guys!! I'm on ATT, but if this works on Verizon it won't be long before ATT sees a windfall too. Monkey dumbass see, monkey do.

Ask for a hard copy bill and pay via snail mail with a check. That way they have to print and mail the bill and handle the check. Tell them you would like to pay via phone but the network is too unreliable.

Can y'all hear me now?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

apple watch ultra yellow

What's Next for the Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Apple Watch SE 3

Friday April 25, 2025 2:44 pm PDT by
This week marks the 10th anniversary of the Apple Watch, which launched on April 24, 2015. Yesterday, we recapped features rumored for the Apple Watch Series 11, but since 2015, the Apple Watch has also branched out into the Apple Watch Ultra and the Apple Watch SE, so we thought we'd take a look at what's next for those product lines, too. 2025 Apple Watch Ultra 3 Apple didn't update the...
iPhone 17 Air Pastel Feature

iPhone 17 Air Launching Later This Year With These 16 New Features

Thursday April 24, 2025 8:24 am PDT by
While the so-called "iPhone 17 Air" is not expected to launch until September, there are already plenty of rumors about the ultra-thin device. Overall, the iPhone 17 Air sounds like a mixed bag. While the device is expected to have an impressively thin and light design, rumors indicate it will have some compromises compared to iPhone 17 Pro models, including only a single rear camera, a...
iPhone 17 Pro Blue Feature Tighter Crop

iPhone 17 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 13 New Features

Wednesday April 23, 2025 8:31 am PDT by
While the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max are not expected to launch until September, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. Below, we recap key changes rumored for the iPhone 17 Pro models as of April 2025: Aluminum frame: iPhone 17 Pro models are rumored to have an aluminum frame, whereas the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro models have a titanium frame, and the iPhone ...
iPhone 17 Air Pastel Feature

iPhone 17 Reaches Key Milestone Ahead of Mass Production

Monday April 28, 2025 8:44 am PDT by
Apple has completed Engineering Validation Testing (EVT) for at least one iPhone 17 model, according to a paywalled preview of an upcoming DigiTimes report. iPhone 17 Air mockup based on rumored design The EVT stage involves Apple testing iPhone 17 prototypes to ensure the hardware works as expected. There are still DVT (Design Validation Test) and PVT (Production Validation Test) stages to...
iphone 16 display

iPhone 17's Scratch Resistant Anti-Reflective Display Coating Canceled

Monday April 28, 2025 12:48 pm PDT by
Apple may have canceled the super scratch resistant anti-reflective display coating that it planned to use for the iPhone 17 Pro models, according to a source with reliable information that spoke to MacRumors. Last spring, Weibo leaker Instant Digital suggested Apple was working on a new anti-reflective display layer that was more scratch resistant than the Ceramic Shield. We haven't heard...
Beyond iPhone 13 Better Blue

20th Anniversary iPhone Likely to Be Made in China Due to 'Extraordinarily Complex' Design

Monday April 28, 2025 4:29 am PDT by
Apple will likely manufacture its 20th anniversary iPhone models in China, despite broader efforts to shift production to India, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In 2027, Apple is planning a "major shake-up" for the iPhone lineup to mark two decades since the original model launched. Gurman's previous reporting indicates the company will introduce a foldable iPhone alongside a "bold"...
top stories 2025 04 26

Top Stories: iPhone 17 Air Rumors, Apple Watch Turns 10, and More

Saturday April 26, 2025 6:00 am PDT by
We've known for quite some time about Apple's plans for a thinner "iPhone 17 Air" coming later this year, but wow, the latest dummy models give us our best look yet at just how thin this phone is going to be. Other Apple news and rumors this week included another iOS 18.5 beta, the 10th anniversary of the Apple Watch launch, and more management reshuffling in Apple's Siri division, so read...